Guestbook

Jeromebuh

27 Jan 2025 - 11:26 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
kra cc

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken войти
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Dannydow

27 Jan 2025 - 11:26 am

A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
kraken даркнет

At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.

As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.

Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.

The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.

And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.

Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.

It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.

Donaldjenny

27 Jan 2025 - 11:25 am

Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
kraken market
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”

For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.

The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken зайти
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.

And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.

Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.

Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.

His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”

Treaszesy

27 Jan 2025 - 10:54 am

[url=https://mostbet-wqd5.top/]https://mostbet-wqd5.top/[/url] - как сегодня можно скачать рабочее зеркало Мостбет и получить доступ к игровым возможностям без блокировок.

Johanhart

27 Jan 2025 - 10:34 am

Установите приложение [url=https://mostbet-wio8.top/]мостбет на андроид[/url] и получите доступ к зеркалу для удобного и безопасного размещения ставок на спортивные события.

Tommyhox

27 Jan 2025 - 09:47 am

New Glenn’s first flight
Blue Origin formally announced the development of New Glenn — which aims to outpower SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets and haul spacecraft up to 45 metric tons (99,200 pounds) to orbit — in 2016.
[url=https://kra26att.cc]kraken тор[/url]
The vehicle is long overdue, as the company previously targeted 2020 for its first launch.

Delays, however, are common in the aerospace industry. And the debut flight of a new vehicle is almost always significantly behind schedule.

Rocket companies also typically take a conservative approach to the first liftoff, launching dummy payloads such as hunks of metal or, as was the case with SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy debut in 2018, an old cherry red sports car.
https://kra26att.cc
кракен вход
Blue Origin has also branded itself as a company that aims to take a slow, diligent approach to rocket development that doesn’t “cut any corners,” according to Bezos, who founded Blue Origin and funds the company.

The company’s mascot is a tortoise, paying homage to “The Tortoise and the Hare” fable that made the “slow and steady wins the race” mantra a childhood staple.

“We believe slow is smooth and smooth is fast,” Bezos said in 2016. Those comments could be seen as an attempt to position Blue Origin as the anti-SpaceX, which is known to embrace speed and trial-and-error over slow, meticulous development processes.
But SpaceX has certainly won the race to orbit. The company’s first orbital rocket, the Falcon 1, made a successful launch in September 2008. The company has deployed hundreds of missions to orbit since then.

And while SpaceX routinely destroys rockets during test flights as it begins developing a new rocket, the company has a solid track record for operational missions. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, for example, has experienced two in-flight failures and one launchpad explosion but no catastrophic events during human missions.

Andrewnat

27 Jan 2025 - 08:05 am

Bonding on a stalled train
гей порно видео
In 1990, Derek Barclay was 21 and studying to become a construction engineer. He’d saved up money from an unglamorous summer job building a prison to buy an Interrail pass.

“Then, I dumped my bag at my mum’s house and said, ‘I’m off to Europe.’ She was horrified,” Derek tells CNN Travel today.

“The idea was to go from Casablanca to Istanbul. But I never went to either. Along the way I met Nina and I got distracted …”

While Nina and Derek formally met for the first time on the stalled train in Belgrade, Derek had first spotted Nina on a busy station platform, some hours earlier, in Budapest.

When he spotted her sitting on a bench, smiling and laughing with Loa, Derek was struck by Nina right away. For a moment, he imagined getting to know her, what she might be like. Where she might be from, where she might be going.

But then Derek had ended up on a different train. He’d met and got chatting to Steve the Englishman and Paul the Irishman. The trio had shared a couple of beers, fallen asleep, and woken, with a start, in Belgrade, to a suddenly-empty carriage. That’s when they panicked.

“We woke up, and just ran down the railway line — because we’re just about to miss this train to Athens — we jumped on the train as it was pulling away, and then it stopped,” Derek tells CNN Travel today. “Apparently that’s what they had to do to get the strike official.”

When Derek, Steve and Paul opened the door to Nina’s carriage, Derek didn’t immediately take Nina in, focusing instead on the near-empty compartment.

“Two of them in there, this carriage for eight, they’d spread stuff everywhere. It was obvious it was a ruse to try and get people not to go in. And we thought, ‘We’re not having any of that,’” says Derek, laughing. “So we squeezed in, and that was that.”

It was only when he ended up sitting opposite Nina that Derek realized she was the woman he’d noticed on the Budapest train platform.

Then they got chatting, and didn’t stop. They talked about a shared love of nature. About Derek being a member of Greenpeace. About Sweden and Scotland.

Eugenedog

27 Jan 2025 - 07:56 am

The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
кракен даркнет

Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.

The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken marketplace
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.

So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?

In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.

Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?

According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.

“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”

“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”

Rogerzes

27 Jan 2025 - 07:48 am

[b]Bitcoin Mixers and Tumblers: Websites Overview[/b]


[b][url=https://blender-btc.com]Bitcoin Mix[/url][/b]

[b]Bitcoin Mix[/b] is a trusted service for anonymous and secure BTC mixing. The platform offers a high level of privacy, low fees, and coins with verified history. Operating since 2017, Bitcoin Mix has established itself as a reliable tool for ensuring anonymity in blockchain transactions. The main goal of the service is to provide users with the ability to maintain confidentiality without compromise.

[b]Advantages of Bitcoin Mix[/b]


[b]Complete Privacy[/b]: All data is deleted immediately after the transaction is completed. The platform follows a strict no-log policy, retaining no user information.
[b]Instant Transactions[/b]: Thanks to internal reserves, the service ensures immediate transaction execution, eliminating the wait for transaction pool confirmation.
[b]Support for Modern Addresses[/b]: Compatibility with SegWit and bech32 speeds up transaction processing.
[b]Flexible Transaction Delays[/b]: Users can set a delay of up to 7 days to enhance anonymity.
[b]Dynamic Fees[/b]: Option to set fees within a range of 0.5–2.5%.


[b]How Does Bitcoin Mix Work?[/b]


Enter the wallet address(es) where you want to receive "clean" coins. The minimum transfer amount is 0.005 BTC.
Set your preferences: choose delay and fee levels.
Leave the mixing code field blank if this is your first time using the service.
Receive the deposit address and send your coins within 24 hours.
Download the guarantee letter confirming your payment.


The process is fully automated. There is no need to keep your browser open—the service ensures security and ease of use.

[b]Why Choose Bitcoin Mix?[/b]


[b]Years of Experience[/b]: Since 2017, the platform has been helping users maintain confidentiality.
[b]Modern Technology[/b]: Support for new address formats and instant transactions.
[b]Ease of Use[/b]: An intuitive interface and automated process.


[b]Useful Links:[/b]


[url=https://blender-btc.com]Official Website[/url]
[url=http://blenderxzgdsdrdsz5rkuh6e6fpe6zckdpos2tuscp4epmyngmbcqmqd.onion]TOR Mirror[/url]


[b]Bitcoin Mix[/b] is your best choice for safe and anonymous BTC mixing.


[b]Bitcoin Mixers and Tumblers: Understanding the Basics[/b]

[b]Introduction to Bitcoin Tumblers[/b]

Bitcoin tumblers, also known as mixers, are essential tools for cryptocurrency users seeking enhanced privacy. They work by obscuring the origin of funds, making it difficult to trace transactions on the blockchain. As the use of cryptocurrencies grows, so does the need for tools like Bitcoin Mix to ensure secure and confidential transactions.

[b]Features of a Reliable Bitcoin Mixer[/b]


[b]Privacy Guarantee[/b]: A trustworthy mixer must employ robust no-log policies.
[b]Fast and Efficient[/b]: Transactions should be processed without unnecessary delays.
[b]Flexible Options[/b]: Users should have control over fees and delays to suit their needs.
[b]Compatibility[/b]: Support for various wallet types, including SegWit and bech32.


[b]Why Bitcoin Mix Stands Out[/b]

Bitcoin Mix combines cutting-edge technology with user-focused features. From instant transactions to customizable fees, it caters to a wide range of privacy needs. The platform’s long-standing reputation since 2017 further solidifies its position as a leading Bitcoin mixer.

[b]Get Started with Bitcoin Mix[/b]

Using Bitcoin Mix is simple: specify your receiving wallet, set preferences, and let the service handle the rest. With guaranteed privacy and efficiency, Bitcoin Mix remains a top choice for secure cryptocurrency transactions.

[b]Secure Your Cryptocurrency Transactions Today[/b]

Bitcoin Mix offers the ultimate solution for anonymous BTC mixing. Whether you’re a seasoned crypto user or new to the world of blockchain, this platform ensures your transactions remain private and secure. Choose Bitcoin Mix for unparalleled confidentiality in 2025.

Marieandew

27 Jan 2025 - 07:29 am

https://reklamaxxx.biz/sankt-peterburg/ - вакансии девушкам Санкт-Петербург


вакансии девушкам Уфа

https://reklamaxxx.biz/krym/